↓ Skip to main content

15q11.2 microdeletion (BP1–BP2) and developmental delay, behaviour issues, epilepsy and congenital heart disease: A series of 52 patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Genetics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,114)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
15q11.2 microdeletion (BP1–BP2) and developmental delay, behaviour issues, epilepsy and congenital heart disease: A series of 52 patients
Published in
European Journal of Medical Genetics, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clémence Vanlerberghe, Florence Petit, Valérie Malan, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Sonia Bouquillon, Odile Boute, Muriel Holder-Espinasse, Bruno Delobel, Bénédicte Duban, Louis Vallee, Jean-Marie Cuisset, Marie-Pierre Lemaitre, Marie-Christine Vantyghem, Marie Pigeyre, Sandrine Lanco-Dosen, Ghislaine Plessis, Marion Gerard, Matthieu Decamp, Michèle Mathieu, Gilles Morin, Guillaume Jedraszak, Frédéric Bilan, Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier, Delphine Fauvert, Joëlle Roume, Valérie Cormier-Daire, Roseline Caumes, Jacques Puechberty, David Genevieve, Pierre Sarda, Lucie Pinson, Patricia Blanchet, Nathalie Lemeur, Frenny Sheth, Sylvie Manouvrier-Hanu, Joris Andrieux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Psychology 15 10%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,534,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Genetics
#26
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,735
of 365,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Genetics
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.