↓ Skip to main content

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging
Published in
European Radiology, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1174-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Cirillo, Massimo Petracchini, Lorenza Scotti, Teresa Gallo, Annalisa Macera, Maria Cristina Bona, Cinzia Ortega, Pietro Gabriele, Daniele Regge

Abstract

To evaluate diagnostic performance of endorectal magnetic resonance (eMR) for diagnosing local recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) in patients with previous radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess whether contrast-enhanced (CE)-eMR improved diagnostic accuracy in comparison to unenhanced study. Unenhanced eMR data of 72 male patients (mean of total PSA: 1.23 +/- 1.3 ng/ml) with previous RP were interpreted retrospectively and classified either as normal or suspicious for local recurrence. All eMR examinations were re-evaluated also on CE-eMR 4 months after the first reading. Images were acquired on a 1.5-T system. These data were compared to the standard of reference for local recurrence: prostatectomy bed biopsy results; choline positron emission tomography results; PSA reduction or increase after pelvic radiotherapy; PSA modification during active surveillance. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 61.4%, 82.1%, 84.4%, 57.5% and 69.4% for unenhanced eMR and 84.1%, 89.3%, 92.5%, 78.1% and 86.1% for CE-eMR. A statistically significant difference was found between accuracy and sensitivity of the two evaluations (chi(2) = 5.33; p = 0.02 and chi(2) = 9.00; p = 0.0027). EMR had great accuracy for visualizing local recurrence of PC after RP. CE-eMR improved diagnostic performance in comparison with T2-weighted imaging alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 29%