↓ Skip to main content

Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point
Published in
Pathology, June 2010
DOI 10.3109/00313021003787924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett Delahunt, David S. Lamb, John R. Srigley, Judy D. Murray, Chantelle Wilcox, Hemamali Samaratunga, Christopher Atkinson, Nigel A. Spry, David Joseph, James W. Denham

Abstract

To compare the distribution and predictive performance of Gleason grade and scores derived using classical and modified (International Society of Urological Pathology) criteria.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Computer Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%