↓ Skip to main content

Salvage-Prostatektomie

Overview of attention for article published in Die Urologie, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Salvage-Prostatektomie
Published in
Die Urologie, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00120-012-2894-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Franz, H. Pfeiffer, S. Holze, M. Do, A. Dietel, M. Nicolaus, M. Truss, J.-U. Stolzenburg

Abstract

Organ-confined prostate cancer can be treated with curative intent by different types of radiotherapy or by radical surgery. Regardless of improvements in radiotherapy about 60% of patients with prostate cancer develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) which is defined by the progressive increase in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and necessitates further diagnostic procedures. If non-organ-confined cancer and metastasis are categorically excluded by cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) and bone scintigraphy, a prostate biopsy should be performed. Biopsy proven detection of recurrent or persisting prostate cancer after irradiation is essential prior to a salvage prostatectomy. The function of the lower urinary tract should be evaluated prior to surgery. Preoperative PSA measurement is the best prognostic indicator prior to surgery. Salvage prostatectomy in irradiated patients is more challenging and requires extensive skill. The most common complications are incontinence, rectal injury and anastomotic strictures. Both functional and oncologic outcome have improved due to better irradiation techniques and surgical skills. Provided post-radiotherapy recurrence of prostate cancer is diagnosed early enough, curing is possible by salvage prostatectomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 53%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%