↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcome of patients with docetaxel-resistant hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with second-line cyclophosphamide-based metronomic chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Clinical outcome of patients with docetaxel-resistant hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with second-line cyclophosphamide-based metronomic chemotherapy
Published in
Medical Oncology, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12032-009-9218-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Nelius, Tobias Klatte, Werner de Riese, Allan Haynes, Stephanie Filleur

Abstract

For patients with docetaxel-resistant hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) no standard chemotherapeutic treatment exists. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of cyclophosphamide (CP)-based metronomic chemotherapy in this patient population. Patients with metastatic HRPC with disease progression under docetaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Secondary endpoints were survival and toxicity. Low-dose CP (50 mg/d) and dexamethasone (1 mg/d) were administered orally in a metronomic manner. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable side effects occurred. Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 12 weeks (range: 4-60). Median age was 68 years (range: 42-85). Median PSA at study entry was 134 ng/ml (range: 46.0-6554). Nine patients had a PSA response (median 44.4%), four patients >or=50% and five patients <50%. Eight patients had a PSA progression. Overall survival was 24 months. Five patients reported a decrease in bone pain after 4 weeks' treatment. No grade 3 and 4 toxicities were noted. In this study, low-dose metronomically administered CP demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment in patients with docetaxel-resistant HRPC. The treatment was well tolerated and almost without toxicity. Further advantages of low-dose CP were its convenient oral administration, dosing schedule, low cost, and low-toxicity profile. These attributes in combination with immunoregulatory and antiangiogenic potentials make CP also a prime candidate for combination with other treatment regimens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Chemistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,450,670
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#255
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,026
of 93,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.