↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Alternative Initiation, Splicing, and Termination on the Diversity of the mRNA Transcripts Encoded by the Mouse Transcriptome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Alternative Initiation, Splicing, and Termination on the Diversity of the mRNA Transcripts Encoded by the Mouse Transcriptome
Published in
Genome Research, June 2003
DOI 10.1101/gr.1017303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihaela Zavolan, Shinji Kondo, Christian Schonbach, Jun Adachi, David A Hume, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Terry Gaasterland

Abstract

We analyzed the FANTOM2 clone set of 60,770 RIKEN full-length mouse cDNA sequences and 44,122 public mRNA sequences. We developed a new computational procedure to identify and classify the forms of splice variation evident in this data set and organized the results into a publicly accessible database that can be used for future expression array construction, structural genomics, and analyses of the mechanism and regulation of alternative splicing. Statistical analysis shows that at least 41% and possibly as much as 60% of multiexon genes in mouse have multiple splice forms. Of the transcription units with multiple splice forms, 49% contain transcripts in which the apparent use of an alternative transcription start (stop) is accompanied by alternative splicing of the initial (terminal) exon. This implies that alternative transcription may frequently induce alternative splicing. The fact that 73% of all exons with splice variation fall within the annotated coding region indicates that most splice variation is likely to affect the protein form. Finally, we compared the set of constitutive (present in all transcripts) exons with the set of cryptic (present only in some transcripts) exons and found statistically significant differences in their length distributions, the nucleotide distributions around their splice junctions, and the frequencies of occurrence of several short sequence motifs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 92 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor 11 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 21%
Computer Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#3,995
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,275
of 53,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#57
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.