You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biological interpretation of genome-wide association studies using predicted gene functions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms6890 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tune H. Pers, Juha M. Karjalainen, Yingleong Chan, Harm-Jan Westra, Andrew R. Wood, Jian Yang, Julian C. Lui, Sailaja Vedantam, Stefan Gustafsson, Tonu Esko, Tim Frayling, Elizabeth K. Speliotes, Michael Boehnke, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Lude Franke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 28 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 25 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 760 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 195 | 25% |
| Researcher | 194 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 4% |
| Other | 131 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 213 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 192 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 95 | 12% |
| Unknown | 134 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#830,305
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#13,938
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,728
of 363,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#132
of 678 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 678 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.