↓ Skip to main content

Virus neutralization technique as a tool to evaluate the virological profile for bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in dairy water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) herds

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Virus neutralization technique as a tool to evaluate the virological profile for bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in dairy water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) herds
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11250-017-1503-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonália Ferreira Paixão, Juliana Torres Tomazi Fritzen, Alice Fernandes Alfieri, Amauri Alcindo Alfieri

Abstract

Serological evidence shows that the bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infections are present in Brazilian dairy and beef water buffalo herds. As few reports describe the BVDV infection profile the aim of this study was to evaluate the dynamics of BVDV circulation in Brazilian dairy water buffalo herds through analysis of the seropositivity rate and the titer range of anti-BVDV neutralizing antibodies in a group of animals that are considered sentinels. Blood samples (n = 305) were obtained from unvaccinated, asymptomatic young water buffalos from four dairy herds randomly identified as A (n = 106), B (n = 62), C (n = 119), and D (n = 18). The detection and titration of anti-BVDV neutralizing antibodies were evaluated by the virus neutralization test according to the World Organization for Animal Health. Analysis of the results revealed two distinct epidemiological conditions. The first is represented by herds A and C where high rates of seropositive animals (A = 39.6%; C = 51.3%) and high and very variable antibodies titers suggested active BVDV infection. The other condition is represented by herds B and D with low rates of seropositive animals (B = 8.1%; D = 11.1%) and low and little variable antibodies titers suggesting an epidemiological condition of infection stability. Some variables were observed in herds with a distinct BVDV infection profile. Herds with active infection were big, open herds, and had more management practices. In contrast, the herds with infection stability were small, closed herds with few management practices. These results highlight the importance of evaluation, monitoring, and control of BVDV infection also in dairy water buffalo herds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#763
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,985
of 446,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.