↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitory Effects of Four Neonicotinoid Active Ingredients on Acetylcholine Esterase Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia Futura, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Inhibitory Effects of Four Neonicotinoid Active Ingredients on Acetylcholine Esterase Activity
Published in
Biologia Futura, December 2017
DOI 10.1556/018.68.2017.4.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

János Győri, Anna Farkas, Oksana Stolyar, András Székács, Mária Mörtl, Ágnes Vehovszky

Abstract

There is a great concern about the decline of pollinators, and neonicotinoids emerging bee disorders are assumed to play a significant role. Since changes in learning ability has been observed in honey bees exposed to some acetylcholine esterase (AChE) inhibitors, we therefore, tested in vitro the effect of four neonicotinoids on purified eel AChE. AChE activity was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner, and calculated IC50 values for thiamethoxam (IC50 = 414 μM) and clothianidin (IC50 = 160 μM) were found to be much higher compared to acetamiprid (IC50 = 75.2 μM) and thiacloprid (IC50 = 87.8 μM). The Lineweaver-Burk reciprocal plots for acetamiprid shows unchanged Vmax and increased Km values with inhibitor concentrations, while analysis of Michaelis-Menten plots shows predominantly competitive mechanism. The inhibition constant value (Ki = 24.3 μM) indicates strong binding of the acetamiprid complex to AChE. Finally, the four tested neonicotinoids are not a uniform group regarding their blocking ability. Our results suggest a previously not established, direct AChE blocking mechanism of neonicotinoids tested, thus the neuronal AChE enzyme is likely among the direct targets of the neonicotinoid insecticides. We conclude, that these AChE inhibitory effects may also contribute to toxic effects on the whole exposed animal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 33%