↓ Skip to main content

Effect of salt-stress on gene expression in citrus roots revealed by RNA-seq

Overview of attention for article published in Functional & Integrative Genomics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Effect of salt-stress on gene expression in citrus roots revealed by RNA-seq
Published in
Functional & Integrative Genomics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10142-017-0582-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rangjin Xie, Xiaoting Pan, Jing Zhang, Yanyan Ma, Shaolan He, Yongqiang Zheng, Yingtao Ma

Abstract

Citrus, as one of the most economically important fruits worldwide, is adversely affected by salinity stress. However, its molecular mechanisms underlying salinity tolerance are still not clear. In this study, next-generation RNA-seq technology was applied to analyze the gene expression profiling of citrus roots at 3 time points over a 24-h period of salt treatment. A total of 1831 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Among them, 1195 and 1090 DEGs were found at 4 and 24 h, of which 454 were overlapped. Based on functional annotation, the salt overly sensitive (SOS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling pathways were found to be involved. Meanwhile, we found that hormone metabolism and signaling played important roles in salt stress. In addition, a multitude of transcription factors (TFs) including WRKY, NAC, MYB, AP2/ERF, bZIP, GATA, bHLH, ZFP, SPL, CBF, and CAMTA were identified. The genes related to cell wall loosening and stiffening (xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases, peroxidases) were also involved in salt stress. Our data not only provided a genetic resource for discovering salt tolerance-related genes, but also furthered our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in citrus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Researcher 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Psychology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,456,235
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#383
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,305
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.