↓ Skip to main content

Performance of non‐traditional hyperglycemia biomarkers by chronic kidney disease status in older adults with diabetes: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Diabetes, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of non‐traditional hyperglycemia biomarkers by chronic kidney disease status in older adults with diabetes: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Published in
Journal of Diabetes, December 2017
DOI 10.1111/1753-0407.12618
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly Jung, Bethany Warren, Morgan Grams, Yuenting D. Kwong, Tariq Shafi, Josef Coresh, Casey M. Rebholz, Elizabeth Selvin

Abstract

In persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) may be a problematic measure of glycemic control. Glycated albumin and fructosamine have been proposed as better markers of hyperglycemia in CKD. We investigated associations of HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fructosamine with fasting glucose by CKD categories. Cross-sectional analysis of 1,665 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study participants with diagnosed diabetes aged 65 years or older. We compared Spearman's rank correlations (r) and used Deming regression to obtain root mean square errors (RMSEs) for the associations across CKD categories defined using estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Correlations of HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fructosamine with fasting glucose were lowest in persons with severe CKD (HbA1c r=0.52, RMSE=0.91; glycated albumin r=0.39; RMSE=1.89; fructosamine r=0.41; RMSE=1.87) and very severe CKD (r=0.48 and RMSE=1.01 for HbA1c; r=0.36 and RMSE=2.14 for glycated albumin; r=0.36 and RMSE=2.22 for fructosamine). Associations of glycated albumin and fructosamine with HbA1c were relatively similar across CKD categories. In older adults with severe or very severe CKD, HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fructosamine were not highly correlated with fasting glucose. Our results suggest there may be no particular advantage of glycated albumin or fructosamine over HbA1c for monitoring glycemic control in CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,743,252
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Diabetes
#310
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,374
of 449,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Diabetes
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.