You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiancestry association study identifies new asthma risk loci that colocalize with immune-cell enhancer marks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-017-0014-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florence Demenais, Patricia Margaritte-Jeannin, Kathleen C. Barnes, William O. C. Cookson, Janine Altmüller, Wei Ang, R. Graham Barr, Terri H. Beaty, Allan B. Becker, John Beilby, Hans Bisgaard, Unnur Steina Bjornsdottir, Eugene Bleecker, Klaus Bønnelykke, Dorret I. Boomsma, Emmanuelle Bouzigon, Christopher E. Brightling, Myriam Brossard, Guy G. Brusselle, Esteban Burchard, Kristin M. Burkart, Andrew Bush, Moira Chan-Yeung, Kian Fan Chung, Alexessander Couto Alves, John A. Curtin, Adnan Custovic, Denise Daley, Johan C. de Jongste, Blanca E. Del-Rio-Navarro, Kathleen M. Donohue, Liesbeth Duijts, Celeste Eng, Johan G. Eriksson, Martin Farrall, Yuliya Fedorova, Bjarke Feenstra, Manuel A. Ferreira, Maxim B. Freidin, Zofia Gajdos, Jim Gauderman, Ulrike Gehring, Frank Geller, Jon Genuneit, Sina A. Gharib, Frank Gilliland, Raquel Granell, Penelope E. Graves, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Tari Haahtela, Susan R. Heckbert, Dick Heederik, Joachim Heinrich, Markku Heliövaara, John Henderson, Blanca E. Himes, Hiroshi Hirose, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Albert Hofman, Patrick Holt, Jouke Hottenga, Thomas J. Hudson, Jennie Hui, Medea Imboden, Vladimir Ivanov, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Alan James, Christer Janson, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Deborah Jarvis, Graham Jones, Ingileif Jonsdottir, Pekka Jousilahti, Michael Kabesch, Mika Kähönen, David B. Kantor, Alexandra S. Karunas, Elza Khusnutdinova, Gerard H. Koppelman, Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Eskil Kreiner, Michiaki Kubo, Rajesh Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Mikko Kuokkanen, Lies Lahousse, Tarja Laitinen, Catherine Laprise, Mark Lathrop, Susanne Lau, Young-Ae Lee, Terho Lehtimäki, Sébastien Letort, Albert M. Levin, Guo Li, Liming Liang, Laura R. Loehr, Stephanie J. London, Daan W. Loth, Ani Manichaikul, Ingo Marenholz, Fernando J. Martinez, Melanie C. Matheson, Rasika A. Mathias, Kenji Matsumoto, Hamdi Mbarek, Wendy L. McArdle, Mads Melbye, Erik Melén, Deborah Meyers, Sven Michel, Hamida Mohamdi, Arthur W. Musk, Rachel A. Myers, Maartje A. E. Nieuwenhuis, Emiko Noguchi, George T. O’Connor, Ludmila M. Ogorodova, Cameron D. Palmer, Aarno Palotie, Julie E. Park, Craig E. Pennell, Göran Pershagen, Alexey Polonikov, Dirkje S. Postma, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Valery P. Puzyrev, Benjamin A. Raby, Olli T. Raitakari, Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Stephen S. Rich, Colin F. Robertson, Isabelle Romieu, Muhammad T. Salam, Veikko Salomaa, Vivi Schlünssen, Robert Scott, Polina A. Selivanova, Torben Sigsgaard, Angela Simpson, Valérie Siroux, Lewis J. Smith, Maria Solodilova, Marie Standl, Kari Stefansson, David P. Strachan, Bruno H. Stricker, Atsushi Takahashi, Philip J. Thompson, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Carla M. T. Tiesler, Dara G. Torgerson, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, André G. Uitterlinden, Ralf J. P. van der Valk, Amaury Vaysse, Sailaja Vedantam, Andrea von Berg, Erika von Mutius, Judith M. Vonk, Johannes Waage, Nick J. Wareham, Scott T. Weiss, Wendy B. White, Magnus Wickman, Elisabeth Widén, Gonneke Willemsen, L. Keoki Williams, Inge M. Wouters, James J. Yang, Jing Hua Zhao, Miriam F. Moffatt, Carole Ober, Dan L. Nicolae |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 51% |
| Scientists | 24 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 401 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 104 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 125 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#375,124
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#736
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,413
of 451,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#16
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.