| Title |
2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clyde W Yancy, James L Januzzi, Larry A Allen, Javed Butler, Leslie L Davis, Gregg C Fonarow, Nasrien E Ibrahim, Mariell Jessup, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Thomas M Maddox, Frederick A Masoudi, Shweta R Motiwala, J Herbert Patterson, Mary Norine Walsh, Alan Wasserman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 486 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 103 | 21% |
| Spain | 68 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 17 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 3% |
| Mexico | 14 | 3% |
| Colombia | 10 | 2% |
| Chile | 9 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 171 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 338 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 79 | 16% |
| Scientists | 54 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 79 | 26% |
| Unknown | 94 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 103 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 356. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#91,929
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#211
of 16,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,130
of 450,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#8
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.