↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Impact of an electronic monitoring device and behavioural feedback on adherence to multiple sclerosis therapies in youth: results of a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Impact of an electronic monitoring device and behavioural feedback on adherence to multiple sclerosis therapies in youth: results of a randomized trial
Published in
Quality of Life Research, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11136-017-1773-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Ann Yeh, Stephanie A. Grover, Victoria E. Powell, Gulay Alper, Brenda L. Banwell, Kim Edwards, Mark Gorman, Jennifer Graves, Timothy E. Lotze, Jean K. Mah, Lauren Mednick, Jayne Ness, Maya Obadia, Ruth Slater, Amy Waldman, Emmanuelle Waubant, Carolyn E. Schwartz, on behalf of the Pediatric MS Adherence Study Group

Abstract

The clinicaltrials.gov identifying number for the article titled "Impact of an electronic monitoring device and behavioral feedback on adherence to multiple sclerosis therapies in youth: results of a randomized trial" is NCT02234713 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02234713).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 67%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 22 67%
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,556,454
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,537
of 2,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,227
of 442,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#33
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,938 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.