↓ Skip to main content

ラットのアキレス腱修復に与える鍼通電刺激の効果

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ラットのアキレス腱修復に与える鍼通電刺激の効果
Published in
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine, February 2012
DOI 10.11390/onki.75.112
Authors

大井 優紀, 井上 基浩, 中島 美和, 糸井 恵, 北小路 博司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#52
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,000
of 253,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them