↓ Skip to main content

Modifying continuous-time random walks to model finite-size particle diffusion in granular porous media

Overview of attention for article published in Granular Matter, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Modifying continuous-time random walks to model finite-size particle diffusion in granular porous media
Published in
Granular Matter, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10035-016-0694-1
Authors

Shahar Amitai, Raphael Blumenfeld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Professor 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Engineering 2 22%
Materials Science 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Granular Matter
#87
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,958
of 423,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Granular Matter
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them