↓ Skip to main content

Microevolution Rather than Large Genome Divergence Determines the Effectiveness of Legume–Rhizobia Symbiotic Interaction Under Field Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Microevolution Rather than Large Genome Divergence Determines the Effectiveness of Legume–Rhizobia Symbiotic Interaction Under Field Conditions
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00239-017-9808-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cintia Jozefkowicz, Silvina Brambilla, Romina Frare, Margarita Stritzler, Mariana Puente, Carlos Piccinetti, Gabriela Soto, Nicolás Ayub

Abstract

Despite the vast screening for natural nitrogen-fixing isolates by public and private consortia, no significant progresses in the production of improved nitrogen-fixing inoculants for alfalfa production have been made in the last years. Here, we present a comprehensive characterization of the nitrogen-fixing strain Ensifer meliloti B399 (originally named Rhizobium meliloti 102F34), probably the inoculant most widely used in alfalfa production since the 1960s. Complete nucleotide sequence and genome analysis of strain B399 showed that the three replicons present in this commercial strain and the model bacterium Ensifer meliloti 1021 are extremely similar to each other in terms of nucleotide identity and synteny conservation. In contrast to that observed in B399-treated plants, inoculation of plants with strain 1021 did not improve nitrogen content in different alfalfa cultivars under field conditions, suggesting that a small genomic divergence can drastically impact on the symbiotic phenotype. Therefore, in addition to the traditional screening of natural nitrogen-fixing isolates, the genome engineering of model strains could be an attractive strategy to improve nitrogen fixation in legume crops.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,884,573
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,079
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,411
of 317,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.