↓ Skip to main content

C-section without father: Evolution, disparity, causes and consequences from the users’ perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Revue de Médecine Périnatale, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
C-section without father: Evolution, disparity, causes and consequences from the users’ perspective
Published in
Revue de Médecine Périnatale, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12611-017-0427-7
Authors

Césarine Association

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,994,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revue de Médecine Périnatale
#3
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,712
of 338,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revue de Médecine Périnatale
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them