You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mapping perceptions of species' threats and population trends to inform conservation efforts: the Bornean orangutan case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12286 |
Authors |
Nicola K. Abram, Erik Meijaard, Jessie A. Wells, Marc Ancrenaz, Anne‐Sophie Pellier, Rebecca K. Runting, David Gaveau, Serge Wich, Nardiyono, Albertus Tjiu, Anton Nurcahyo, Kerrie Mengersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 25% |
Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 261 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 15% |
Researcher | 40 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
Other | 33 | 12% |
Unknown | 49 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 70 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 8% |
Unknown | 56 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,309,778
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#429
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,507
of 360,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.