↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the effects of a clinically implemented exercise program on physical fitness, fatigue, and depression in cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the effects of a clinically implemented exercise program on physical fitness, fatigue, and depression in cancer survivors
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-4019-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan J. Marker, Emily Cox-Martin, Catherine M. Jankowski, W. Thomas Purcell, John C. Peters

Abstract

Despite national recommendations, exercise programs are still not clinically implemented as standard of care for cancer survivors. This investigation examined the effects of a clinically implemented and personalized exercise program on physical fitness, fatigue, and depression in a diverse population of cancer survivors. The association of various participant characteristics on program performance was also examined. Data were collected from 170 cancer survivors who had participated in a clinical exercise program. Any cancer type was included and survivors were either undergoing medical treatment or had completed treatment (< 6 months prior to program initiation). Baseline and post program measures of estimated VO2peak, grip strength, fatigue, and depression were compared in survivors who completed the program follow-up. Multiple regressions were performed to investigate the association of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and medical treatment status on baseline and change scores in outcome measures, as well as program adherence. All measures improved in participants who completed the program (p < 0.01). Age, gender, and BMI were associated with baseline measures of estimated VO2peak and grip strength (p < 0.01), and age was inversely associated with baseline fatigue (p = 0.02). Only BMI was inversely associated with change in estimated VO2peak (p < 0.01). No participant characteristics or baseline measures were predictive of program adherence (p > 0.05). This investigation provides evidence that a personalized, clinical exercise program can be effective at improving physical fitness, fatigue, and depression in a diverse population of cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Sports and Recreations 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 42 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,286,488
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#749
of 4,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,278
of 440,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#35
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.