| Title |
How to make landscape genetics beneficial for conservation management?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-014-0684-y |
| Authors |
Daniela Keller, Rolf Holderegger, Maarten J. van Strien, Janine Bolliger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 292 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 26% |
| Researcher | 72 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 54 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,891,187
of 23,622,736 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#339
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,866
of 356,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,622,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.