↓ Skip to main content

Understanding health through social practices: performance and materiality in everyday life

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding health through social practices: performance and materiality in everyday life
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, January 2015
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.12178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecily Jane Maller

Abstract

The importance of recognising structure and agency in health research to move beyond methodological individualism is well documented. To progress incorporating social theory into health, researchers have used Giddens' and Bourdieu's conceptualisations of social practice to understand relationships between agency, structure and health. However, social practice theories have more to offer than has currently been capitalised upon. This article delves into contemporary theories of social practice as used in consumption and sustainability research to provide an alternative, and more contextualised means, of understanding and explaining human action in relation to health and wellbeing. Two key observations are made. Firstly, the latest formulations of social practice theory distinguish moments of practice performance from practices as persistent entities across time and space, allowing empirical application to explain practice histories and future trajectories. Secondly, they emphasise the materiality of everyday life, foregrounding things, technologies and other non-humans that cannot be ignored in a technologically dependent social world. In concluding, I argue the value of using contemporary social practice theories in health research is that they reframe the way in which health outcomes can be understood and could inform more effective interventions that move beyond attitudes, behaviour and choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 277 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 22%
Student > Master 45 16%
Researcher 39 14%
Lecturer 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 52 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 96 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 72 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,566,707
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#267
of 2,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,495
of 364,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.