Title |
New Developments in the Theory of Adverse Selection in Competitive Insurance
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1057/grir.2014.11 |
Authors |
Wanda Mimra, Achim Wambach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 33% |
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 44% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 11% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,900,457
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review
#20
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,624
of 253,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.