↓ Skip to main content

Rare Earths and the Balance Problem

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Rare Earths and the Balance Problem
Published in
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40831-014-0005-1
Authors

Koen Binnemans, Peter Tom Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 191 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 31 16%
Engineering 20 10%
Materials Science 17 9%
Environmental Science 16 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 61 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
#70
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,713
of 352,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.