↓ Skip to main content

Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cancer Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 1,449)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
391 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
526 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy
Published in
Seminars in Cancer Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zongwei Wang, Charlotta Dabrosin, Xin Yin, Mark M. Fuster, Alexandra Arreola, W. Kimryn Rathmell, Daniele Generali, Ganji P. Nagaraju, Bassel El-Rayes, Domenico Ribatti, Yi Charlie Chen, Kanya Honoki, Hiromasa Fujii, Alexandros G. Georgakilas, Somaira Nowsheen, Amedeo Amedei, Elena Niccolai, Amr Amin, S. Salman Ashraf, Bill Helferich, Xujuan Yang, Gunjan Guha, Dipita Bhakta, Maria Rosa Ciriolo, Katia Aquilano, Sophie Chen, Dorota Halicka, Sulma I. Mohammed, Asfar S. Azmi, Alan Bilsland, W. Nicol Keith, Lasse D. Jensen

Abstract

Deregulation of angiogenesis-the growth of new blood vessels from an existing vasculature-is a main driving force in many severe human diseases including cancer. As such, tumor angiogenesis is important for delivering oxygen and nutrients to growing tumors, and therefore considered an essential pathologic feature of cancer, while also playing a key role in enabling other aspects of tumor pathology such as metabolic deregulation and tumor dissemination/metastasis. Recently, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis has become a clinical anti-cancer strategy in line with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, which underscore the critical importance of the angiogenic switch during early tumor development. Unfortunately the clinically approved anti-angiogenic drugs in use today are only effective in a subset of the patients, and many who initially respond develop resistance over time. Also, some of the anti-angiogenic drugs are toxic and it would be of great importance to identify alternative compounds, which could overcome these drawbacks and limitations of the currently available therapy. Finding "the most important target" may, however, prove a very challenging approach as the tumor environment is highly diverse, consisting of many different cell types, all of which may contribute to tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, the tumor cells themselves are genetically unstable, leading to a progressive increase in the number of different angiogenic factors produced as the cancer progresses to advanced stages. As an alternative approach to targeted therapy, options to broadly interfere with angiogenic signals by a mixture of non-toxic natural compound with pleiotropic actions were viewed by this team as an opportunity to develop a complementary anti-angiogenesis treatment option. As a part of the "Halifax Project" within the "Getting to know cancer" framework, we have here, based on a thorough review of the literature, identified 10 important aspects of tumor angiogenesis and the pathological tumor vasculature which would be well suited as targets for anti-angiogenic therapy; 1) endothelial cell migration/tip cell formation, 2) structural abnormalities of tumor vessels, 3) hypoxia, 4) lymphangiogenesis, 5) elevated interstitial fluid pressure, 6) poor perfusion, 7) disrupted circadian rhythms, 8) tumor promoting inflammation, 9) tumor promoting fibroblasts and 10) tumor cell metabolism/acidosis. Following this analysis, we scrutinized the available literature on broadly acting anti-angiogenic natural products, with a focus on finding qualitative information on phytochemicals which could inhibit these targets and came up with 10 prototypical phytochemical compounds; 1) oleic acid, 2) tripterine, 3) silibinin, 4) curcumin, 5) epigallocatechin-gallate, 6) kaempferol, 7) melatonin, 8) enterolactone, 9) withaferin A and 10) resveratrol. We suggest that these plant-derived compounds could be combined to constitute a broader acting and more effective inhibitory cocktail at doses that would not be likely to cause excessive toxicity. All the targets and phytochemical approaches were further cross-validated against their effects on other essential tumorigenic pathways (based on the "hallmarks" of cancer) in order to discover possible synergies or potentially harmful interactions, and were found to generally also have positive involvement in/effects on these other aspects of tumor biology. The aim is that this discussion could lead to the selection of combinations of such anti-angiogenic compounds which could be used in potent anti-tumor cocktails, for enhanced therapeutic efficacy, reduced toxicity and circumvention of single-agent anti-angiogenic resistance, as well as for possible use in primary or secondary cancer prevention strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 511 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 18%
Student > Master 81 15%
Student > Bachelor 65 12%
Researcher 55 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 104 20%
Unknown 99 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 41 8%
Chemistry 19 4%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 123 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,485,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#29
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,982
of 360,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them