↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis of malaria parasite lysyl-tRNA synthetase inhibition by cladosporin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structural basis of malaria parasite lysyl-tRNA synthetase inhibition by cladosporin
Published in
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10969-014-9182-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameena Khan, Arvind Sharma, Hassan Belrhali, Manickam Yogavel, Amit Sharma

Abstract

Malaria parasites inevitably develop drug resistance to anti-malarials over time. Hence the immediacy for discovering new chemical scaffolds to include in combination malaria drug therapy. The desirable attributes of new chemotherapeutic agents currently include activity against both liver and blood stage malaria parasites. One such recently discovered compound called cladosporin abrogates parasite growth via inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase (PfKRS), an enzyme central to protein translation. Here, we present crystal structure of ternary PfKRS-lysine-cladosporin (PfKRS-K-C) complex that reveals cladosporin's remarkable ability to mimic the natural substrate adenosine and thereby colonize PfKRS active site. The isocoumarin fragment of cladosporin sandwiches between critical adenine-recognizing residues while its pyran ring fits snugly in the ribose-recognizing cavity. PfKRS-K-C structure highlights ample space within PfKRS active site for further chemical derivatization of cladosporin. Such derivatives may be useful against additional human pathogens that retain high conservation in cladosporin chelating residues within their lysyl-tRNA synthetase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Burkina Faso 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 26%
Chemistry 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#87
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,831
of 228,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.