↓ Skip to main content

Colwellia arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic marine sediment

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Colwellia arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic marine sediment
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10482-014-0366-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng-Qing Wang, Xue-Zheng Lin, Guan-Jun Chen, Zong-Jun Du

Abstract

Strain 435(T), a catalase- and oxidase-positive, beige-pigmented, facultatively anaerobic and Gram-stain-negative marine bacterium, was isolated from marine sediment collected in the Arctic (8°21'629''E 72°8'827''N). The cells of the type strain are short- to curve-rods and able to grow at 4-25 °C, pH 6.0-9.0 and in the presence of 0.5-6.0 % (w/v) NaCl. It can reduce nitrate to nitrite. The predominant isoprenoid quinone was identified as Q-8 and the polar lipids are comprised of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol. The DNA G+C content is 38.7 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain 435(T) belongs to the genus Colwellia. Strain 435(T) was found to exhibit 92.1-95.6 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with other species of the genus Colwellia. The differential phenotypic properties, together with the phylogenetic and genetic distinctiveness indicated that strain 435(T) can be considered to represent a novel species, Colwellia arctica sp. nov., of the genus Colwellia. The type strain is 435(T) (=CICC 10860(T) = ATCC BAA-2609(T)).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Engineering 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,631,327
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#378
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,120
of 355,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.