↓ Skip to main content

Students’ Reasoning about the Future of Disturbed or Protected Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Students’ Reasoning about the Future of Disturbed or Protected Ecosystems & the Idea of the ‘Balance of Nature’
Published in
Research in Science Education, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9208-7
Authors

Marida Ergazaki, Georgios Ampatzidis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 36%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,542,740
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#123
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,309
of 186,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them