| Title |
Nutritional composition, physiological functions and processing of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) seeds: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-015-9401-9 |
| Authors |
Yi Zhang, Xu Lu, Shaoxiao Zeng, Xuhui Huang, Zebin Guo, Yafeng Zheng, Yuting Tian, Baodong Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,658,564
of 24,723,421 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#30
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,413
of 291,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,723,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them