You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of New Zealand palaeoclimate from the Last Interglacial to the global Last Glacial Maximum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.017 |
| Authors |
Paul W. Williams, Matt McGlone, Helen Neil, Jian-Xin Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#1,786
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,648
of 361,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#24
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.