↓ Skip to main content

The effects of multi-disciplinary psycho-social care on socio-economic problems in cancer patients: a cluster-randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The effects of multi-disciplinary psycho-social care on socio-economic problems in cancer patients: a cluster-randomized trial
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-4024-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Singer, Julia Roick, Jürgen Meixensberger, Franziska Schiefke, Susanne Briest, Andreas Dietz, Kirsten Papsdorf, Joachim Mössner, Thomas Berg, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Dietger Niederwieser, Annette Keller, Anette Kersting, Helge Danker

Abstract

We examined whether multi-disciplinary stepped psycho-social care decreases financial problems and improves return-to-work in cancer patients. In a university hospital, wards were randomly allocated to either stepped or standard care. Stepped care comprised screening for financial problems, consultation between doctor and patient, and the provision of social service. Outcomes were financial problems at the time of discharge and return-to-work in patients < 65 years old half a year after baseline. The analysis employed mixed-effect multivariate regression modeling. Thirteen wards were randomized and 1012 patients participated (n = 570 in stepped care and n = 442 in standard care). Those who reported financial problems at baseline were less likely to have financial problems at discharge when they had received stepped care (odds ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1, 0.7; p = 0.01). There was no evidence for an effect of stepped care on financial problems in patients without such problems at baseline (OR 1.1, CI 0.5, 2.6; p = 0.82). There were 399 patients < 65 years old who were not retired at baseline. In this group, there was no evidence for an effect of stepped care on being employed half a year after baseline (OR 0.7, CI 0.3, 2.0; p = 0.52). NCT01859429 CONCLUSIONS: Financial problems can be avoided more effectively with multi-disciplinary stepped psycho-social care than with standard care in patients who have such problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 26 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 27 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,579,736
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,647
of 4,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,891
of 440,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#75
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.