↓ Skip to main content

Safe and efficacious artemisinin-based combination treatments for African pregnant women with malaria: a multicentre randomized control trial

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safe and efficacious artemisinin-based combination treatments for African pregnant women with malaria: a multicentre randomized control trial
Published in
Reproductive Health, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-12-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Nambozi, Modest Mulenga, Tinto Halidou, Harry Tagbor, Victor Mwapasa, Linda Kalilani Phiri, Gertrude Kalanda, Innocent Valea, Maminata Traore, David Mwakazanga, Yves Claeys, Céline Schurmans, Maaike De Crop, Joris Menten, Raffaella Ravinetto, Kamala Thriemer, Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden, Theonest Mutabingwa, Umberto D’Alessandro, Pregact Group

Abstract

Asymptomatic and symptomatic malaria during pregnancy has consequences for both mother and her offspring. Unfortunately, there is insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of most antimalarials in pregnancy. Indeed, clinical trials assessing antimalarial treatments systematically exclude pregnancy for fear of teratogenicity and embryotoxicity. The little available information originates from South East Asia while in sub-Saharan Africa such information is still limited and needs to be provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 67 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,320
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,966
of 379,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#34
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.