↓ Skip to main content

Interplay of weak interactions in the atom-by-atom condensation of xenon within quantum boxes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interplay of weak interactions in the atom-by-atom condensation of xenon within quantum boxes
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylwia Nowakowska, Aneliia Wäckerlin, Shigeki Kawai, Toni Ivas, Jan Nowakowski, Shadi Fatayer, Christian Wäckerlin, Thomas Nijs, Ernst Meyer, Jonas Björk, Meike Stöhr, Lutz H. Gade, Thomas A. Jung

Abstract

Condensation processes are of key importance in nature and play a fundamental role in chemistry and physics. Owing to size effects at the nanoscale, it is conceptually desired to experimentally probe the dependence of condensate structure on the number of constituents one by one. Here we present an approach to study a condensation process atom-by-atom with the scanning tunnelling microscope, which provides a direct real-space access with atomic precision to the aggregates formed in atomically defined 'quantum boxes'. Our analysis reveals the subtle interplay of competing directional and nondirectional interactions in the emergence of structure and provides unprecedented input for the structural comparison with quantum mechanical models. This approach focuses on-but is not limited to-the model case of xenon condensation and goes significantly beyond the well-established statistical size analysis of clusters in atomic or molecular beams by mass spectrometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Sri Lanka 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 41%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 16 47%
Chemistry 8 24%
Materials Science 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#585,905
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,178
of 49,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,090
of 357,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#108
of 683 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 683 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.