↓ Skip to main content

Renal Dysfunction Is Associated With a Reduced Contribution of Nitric Oxide and Enhanced Vasoconstriction After a Congenital Renal Mass Reduction in Sheep

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal Dysfunction Is Associated With a Reduced Contribution of Nitric Oxide and Enhanced Vasoconstriction After a Congenital Renal Mass Reduction in Sheep
Published in
Circulation, November 2014
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.114.013930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yugeesh R Lankadeva, Reetu R Singh, Karen M Moritz, Helena C Parkington, Kate M Denton, Marianne Tare

Abstract

Children born with reduced congenital renal mass have an increased risk of hypertension and chronic kidney disease in adulthood, although the mechanisms are poorly understood. Similar sequelae occur after fetal uninephrectomy (uni-x) in sheep, leading to a 30% nephron deficit. We hypothesized that renal dysfunction is underpinned by a reduced contribution of nitric oxide (NO) and vascular dysfunction in uni-x sheep.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#18,298
of 21,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,617
of 275,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#125
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.