| Title |
Learning from a Learning Collaboration: The CORC Approach to Combining Research, Evaluation and Practice in Child Mental Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-014-0592-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isobel Fleming, Melanie Jones, Jenna Bradley, Miranda Wolpert |
| Abstract |
This paper outlines the experience of the Child Outcomes Research Consortium-formerly known as the CAMHS Outcomes Research Consortium; the named changed in 2014 in recognition of the widening scope of the work of the collaboration; a learning collaboration of service providers, funders, service user groups and researchers across the UK and beyond, jointly committed to collecting and using routinely collected outcome data to improve and enhance service provision and improve understanding of how best to help young people with mental health issues and their families. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,924,314
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#203
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,113
of 252,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.