You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BRAF Wild-Type Melanoma in Situ Arising In a BRAF V600E Mutant Dysplastic Nevus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3775 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Marie Tan, Lynlee L. Lin, Duncan Lambie, Ross Flewell-Smith, Kasturee Jagirdar, Helmut Schaider, Richard A. Sturm, Tarl W. Prow, H. Peter Soyer |
| Abstract |
The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for the majority of BRAF mutations found in cutaneous melanoma and is also commonly found in nevi. We used dermoscopy-targeted sampling and a microbiopsy device coupled with DNA sequence analysis to highlight BRAF V600E heterogeneity within a multicomponent melanocytic proliferation. This sampling technique demonstrates the prospect of in vivo application in a clinical setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,539,175
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#1,655
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,860
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#38
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.