| Title |
Pea proteins oral supplementation promotes muscle thickness gains during resistance training: a double-blind, randomized, Placebo-controlled clinical trial vs. Whey protein
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-014-0064-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Babault, Christos Païzis, Gaëlle Deley, Laetitia Guérin-Deremaux, Marie-Hélène Saniez, Catherine Lefranc-Millot, François A Allaert |
| Abstract |
The effects of protein supplementation on muscle thickness and strength seem largely dependent on its composition. The current study aimed at comparing the impact of an oral supplementation with vegetable Pea protein (NUTRALYS®) vs. Whey protein and Placebo on biceps brachii muscle thickness and strength after a 12-week resistance training program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 22% |
| Spain | 13 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 60 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 19% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 15% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 17% |
| Unknown | 124 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 73 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Unknown | 145 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#68,251
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#36
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,194
of 450,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#36
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.