↓ Skip to main content

Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Psychiatry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Published in
Australasian Psychiatry, December 2014
DOI 10.1177/1039856214562077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Kisely, Alice Chang, Jim Crowe, Cherrie Galletly, Peter Jenkins, Samantha Loi, Jeffrey C Looi, Matthew D Macfarlane, Ness McVie, Stephen Parker, Brian Power, Dan Siskind, Geoff Smith, Sally Merry, Stephen Macfarlane

Abstract

Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This overview is an introduction to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Psychology 14 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 15%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,927,627
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#511
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,341
of 361,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.