↓ Skip to main content

Fibrates ameliorate the course of bacterial sepsis by promoting neutrophil recruitment via CXCR2

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Molecular Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fibrates ameliorate the course of bacterial sepsis by promoting neutrophil recruitment via CXCR2
Published in
EMBO Molecular Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/emmm.201303415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Tancevski, Manfred Nairz, Kristina Duwensee, Kristina Auer, Andrea Schroll, Christiane Heim, Clemens Feistritzer, Julia Hoefer, Romana R Gerner, Alexander R Moschen, Ingrid Heller, Petra Pallweber, Xiaorong Li, Markus Theurl, Egon Demetz, Anna M Wolf, Dominik Wolf, Philipp Eller, Andreas Ritsch, Guenter Weiss

Abstract

Bacterial sepsis results in high mortality rates, and new therapeutics to control infection are urgently needed. Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of fibrates in the treatment of bacterial sepsis and examine their effects on innate immunity. Fibrates significantly improved the survival from sepsis in mice infected with Salmonella typhimurium, which was paralleled by markedly increased neutrophil influx to the site of infection resulting in rapid clearance of invading bacteria. As a consequence of fibrate-mediated early control of infection, the systemic inflammatory response was repressed in fibrate-treated mice. Mechanistically, we found that fibrates preserve chemotaxis of murine neutrophils by blocking LPS-induced phosphorylation of ERK. This results in a decrease of G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 expression, thereby inhibiting the LPS-mediated downregulation of CXCR2, a chemokine receptor critical for neutrophil recruitment. Accordingly, application of a synthetic CXCR2 inhibitor completely abrogated the protective effects of fibrates in septicemia in vivo. Our results unravel a novel function of fibrates in innate immunity and host response to infection and suggest fibrates as a promising adjunct therapy in bacterial sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,737,508
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Molecular Medicine
#1,347
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,527
of 226,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Molecular Medicine
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.