↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Graphene Growth on Cu(111) versus Oxidized Cu(111)
Published in
Nano Letters, January 2015
DOI 10.1021/nl5036463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Gottardi, Kathrin Müller, Luca Bignardi, Juan Carlos Moreno-López, Tuan Anh Pham, Oleksii Ivashenko, Mikhail Yablonskikh, Alexei Barinov, Jonas Björk, Petra Rudolf, Meike Stöhr

Abstract

The epitaxial growth of graphene on catalytically active metallic surfaces via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is known to be one of the most reliable routes toward high-quality large-area graphene. This CVD-grown graphene is generally coupled to its metallic support resulting in a modification of its intrinsic properties. Growth on oxides is a promising alternative that might lead to a decoupled graphene layer. Here, we compare graphene on a pure metallic to graphene on an oxidized copper surface in both cases grown by a single step CVD process under similar conditions. Remarkably, the growth on copper oxide, a high-k dielectric material, preserves the intrinsic properties of graphene; it is not doped and a linear dispersion is observed close to the Fermi energy. Density functional theory calculations give additional insight into the reaction processes and help explaining the catalytic activity of the copper oxide surface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 199 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 31%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 73 35%
Materials Science 42 20%
Engineering 25 12%
Chemistry 18 9%
Chemical Engineering 6 3%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#765,036
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#586
of 14,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,024
of 361,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#10
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.