↓ Skip to main content

Hypothermia in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Wake-Up Call

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothermia in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Wake-Up Call
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan B Simpson, Vijai S Thomas, Sabir K Ismaily, Pavel I Muradov, Philip C Noble, Stephen J Incavo

Abstract

Total joint patients are particularly vulnerable to perioperative hypothermia (PH) (combined effects of anesthesia, radiation, and convective heat loss from exposed skin surfaces and cool temperatures in the operating room). There are limited studies on PH in these patients. In a retrospective review of 204 patients undergoing primary hip and 179 undergoing primary knee replacement surgeries, time and temperature parameters were collected from the electronic health records from preoperative and postoperative recovery room nursing assessments, intraoperative anesthesia records, and floor nursing notes. Basic patient demographic data was recorded. Chi-squared and paired t-tests were used to compare between hypothermic and normothermic groups. At the time of incision, 60 of 179 (34%) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients and 80 of 204 (39%) total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were hypothermic. In THA patients, 65% remained hypothermic for the duration of anesthesia compared to 33% of TKA patients. The largest drop in core body temperature in both THA and TKA patients occurred between preoperative holding and induction of anesthesia. In THA patients, spinal anesthesia had a significantly higher occurrence of PH. No significant patient factor was found to increase risk. Emphasis on preoperative holding protocols, decreasing time from operating room entry to incision, and increasing ambient room temperature could reduce risk of hypothermia in total joint replacement patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Unspecified 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 19%
Unspecified 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#3,405
of 4,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,052
of 342,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#67
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.