↓ Skip to main content

DART: a new look at the 2-week wait suspected cancer referral process

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
DART: a new look at the 2-week wait suspected cancer referral process
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, November 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x693713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob Eastham, Sean Duffy, Catherine Foster, Andrew Beaumont

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Mathematics 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,456,235
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#4,149
of 4,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,980
of 437,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#79
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.