↓ Skip to main content

Plastic and Non-plastic Debris Ingestion in Three Gull Species Feeding in an Urban Landfill Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 2,224)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
58 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Plastic and Non-plastic Debris Ingestion in Three Gull Species Feeding in an Urban Landfill Environment
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00244-017-0492-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Seif, J. F. Provencher, S. Avery-Gomm, P.-Y. Daoust, M. L. Mallory, P. A. Smith

Abstract

Plastic debris is recognized as a widespread, common and problematic environmental pollutant. An important consequence of this pollution is the ingestion of plastic debris by wildlife. Assessing the degree to which different species ingest plastics, and the potential effects of these plastics on their health are important research needs for understanding the impacts of plastic pollution. We examined debris (plastic and other types) ingestion in three sympatric overwintering gull species (Herring gulls Larus smithsonianus, Great Black-backed Gulls Larus marinus, and Iceland Gulls Larus glaucoides) to understand how debris ingestion differs among species, age classes and sexes in gulls. We also assessed how plastic burdens were associated with body condition to investigate how gulls may be affected by debris ingestion. There were no differences among the species, age classes or sexes in the incidence of debris ingestion (plastic or otherwise), the mass or number of debris pieces ingested. We found no correlation between ingested plastics burdens and individual condition. Gulls ingested plastic debris, but also showed high levels of other debris types as well, including metal, glass and building materials, including a metal piece of debris found within an abscess in the stomach. Thus, when the health effects of debris ingestion on gulls, and other species that ingest debris, is of interest, either from a physical or chemical perspective, it may be necessary to consider all debris types and not just plastic burdens as is often currently done for seabirds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 28%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 46 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#631,236
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#11
of 2,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,532
of 455,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.