↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Temporal Relationship of Asystole to Onset of Transient Loss of Consciousness in Tilt-Induced Reflex Syncope

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Temporal Relationship of Asystole to Onset of Transient Loss of Consciousness in Tilt-Induced Reflex Syncope
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk P. Saal, Roland D. Thijs, Erik W. van Zwet, Marianne Bootsma, Michele Brignole, David G. Benditt, J. Gert van Dijk

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the onset of asystole and transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) in tilt-induced reflex syncope and estimate how often asystole was the principal cause of TLOC. The presence of asystole in vasovagal syncope (VVS) may prompt physicians to consider pacemaker therapy for syncope prevention, but the benefit of pacing is limited in VVS. We evaluated electrocardiography, electroencephalography, blood pressure, and clinical findings during tilt-table tests. Inclusion required TLOC (video), electroencephalographic slowing, accelerating blood pressure decrease, and an RR interval ≥3 s. We excluded cases with nitroglycerin provocation. Asystole after onset of TLOC (group A) or within 3 s before TLOC (group B) was unlikely to cause TLOC, but an earlier start of asystole (group C) could be the cause of TLOC. In one-third of 35 cases (groups A [n = 9] and B [n = 3]), asystole was unlikely to be the primary cause of TLOC. The median of the mean arterial pressure at the onset of asystole was higher when asystole occurred early (45.5 mm Hg, group C) than when it occurred late (32.0 mm Hg, groups A and B), which suggests that vasodepression was not prominent at the start of asystole in early asystole, further suggesting that early asystole was the prime mechanism of syncope. In one-third of cases of tilt-induced asystolic reflex syncope, asystole occurred too late to have been the primary cause of TLOC. Reliance on electrocardiography data only is likely to overestimate the importance of asystole.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,243,153
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#241
of 1,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,698
of 323,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#9
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.