You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and Validation of a Novel Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Monitoring Device
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.07.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naoki Watanabe, Yasuko K. Bando, Taiji Kawachi, Hiroshi Yamakita, Kouki Futatsuyama, Yoshikazu Honda, Hisae Yasui, Kazuyuki Nishimura, Takahiro Kamihara, Takahiro Okumura, Hideki Ishii, Takahisa Kondo, Toyoaki Murohara |
| Abstract |
Ordinary cuff-based blood pressure-monitoring devices remain a technical limitation that disturbs activities of daily life. Here we report a novel system for the cuff-less blood pressure estimation (CLB) that requires only 1 sensor for photoplethysmography. The present study is the first report to validate and assess the clinical application of the CLB in accordance with the latest wearable device standard (issued by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, standard 1708-2014). Our CLB is expected to offer a flexible and wearable device that permits blood pressure monitoring in more continuous and stress-free settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 18% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 8 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 45 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#924,940
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#76
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,983
of 450,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.