↓ Skip to main content

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Fails to Demonstrate Efficacy in a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial on Lung Malignancies: The ALICE Trial

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Fails to Demonstrate Efficacy in a Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial on Lung Malignancies: The ALICE Trial
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00270-014-1049-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Ricke, Julian H. W. Jürgens, Frederic Deschamps, Lambros Tselikas, Katja Uhde, Ortrud Kosiek, Thierry De Baere

Abstract

To assess safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) of lung malignancies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Engineering 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,450,670
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#642
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,332
of 351,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.