Title |
The DNA index is a strong predictive marker in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the results of a five-year prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgery Today, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00595-013-0701-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carsten Kamphues, Nadine Al-Abadi, Angelika Dürr, Roberta Bova, Frederick Klauschen, Albrecht Stenzinger, Marcus Bahra, Hussein Al-Abadi, Peter Neuhaus, Daniel Seehofer |
Abstract |
Predictive markers for risk stratification among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) are still lacking. Therefore, recent studies have focused on identifying the biological aspects of tumors that can provide more information about the tumor aggressiveness. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic potential of the DNA index in patients undergoing liver resection for IHC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#665
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,978
of 199,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.