↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative tools and simultaneous actions needed for species conservation under climate change-Reply to Shoo et al. (2013)

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative tools and simultaneous actions needed for species conservation under climate change-Reply to Shoo et al. (2013)
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1312-z
Authors

Luke P. Shoo, Ary A. Hoffmann, Stephen Garnett, John K. Scott, Stephen E. Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,664
of 5,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,426
of 351,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#54
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.