↓ Skip to main content

Animal Endo-SiRNAs

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Assays for Direct and Indirect Effects of C. elegans Endo-siRNAs.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Assays for Direct and Indirect Effects of C. elegans Endo-siRNAs.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Animal Endo-SiRNAs
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0931-5_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0930-8, 978-1-4939-0931-5
Authors

Shiu PK, Zhuang JJ, Hunter CP, Philip K. Shiu, Jimmy J. Zhuang, Craig P. Hunter

Abstract

Ever since the discovery of the first microRNAs in C. elegans, increasing numbers of endogenous small RNAs have been discovered. Endogenous siRNAs (endo-siRNAs) have emerged in the last few years as a largely independent class of small RNAs that regulate endogenous gene expression, with mechanisms distinct from those of piRNAs and miRNAs. Quantification of these small RNAs and their effect on target RNAs is a powerful tool for the analysis of RNAi; however, detection of small RNAs can be difficult due to their small size and relatively low abundance. Here, we describe the novel FirePlex assay for directly detecting endo-siRNA levels in bulk, as well as an optimized qPCR method for detecting the effect of endo-siRNAs on gene targets. Intriguingly, the loss of endo-siRNAs frequently results in enhanced experimental RNAi. Thus, we also present an optimized method to assess the indirect impact of endo-siRNAs on experimental RNAi efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,869
of 13,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,350
of 228,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#57
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.