You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Flood, Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael P. Geary, Mairead M. Kennelly, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John J. Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth C. Tully, Fergal D. Malone |
| Abstract |
The aim of the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in IUGR Study was to evaluate the optimal management of fetuses with an estimated fetal weight less than the 10th centile. The objective of this secondary analysis was to describe the role of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#11,738
of 13,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,053
of 241,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#72
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.